Happy Thanksgiving!

I don’t know about you but I’m finding myself to be more of a traditionalist these days. I like my holiday season evenly distributed with each holiday given it’s due. So I balk when Christmas decorations start popping up before Halloween and Thanksgiving sort of floats in between. And when Black Friday and Cyber Monday deals start showing up in my inbox weeks ahead of schedule, it throws me off. If these are early deals, shouldn’t I just wait for even better prices after Thanksgiving? But as with so much these days, all this seems subject to wide interpretation and is mostly about marketing anyway. Gosh, I’m feeling grumpy this morning…

Another traditional part of the holidays is people forecasting how much consumers might spend during the shopping season. This, too, is subject to opinion and perspective but consumers are, on average, expected to spend a record amount as they hit the malls, online retailers, and the nation’s roads and airports. The TSA is predicting a record year for Thanksgiving week travel, for example. Easing inflation has helped, along with a strong wealth effect from increased asset prices.Given that consumer spending has accounted for roughly 80% of GDP growth this year, more spending is a good sign for our economy, even when viewed through the tempered lens below. I’ll again lean on a quick summary and chart from JPMorgan this week that illustrates this point.

Besides that, I’d like to take a moment to wish you and yours a wonderful Thanksgiving. This is one of my favorite holidays. Family and friends come together in gratitude and appreciation for, well, everything. There’s good food and drink, and perhaps discussions stretching beyond politics. Enjoy!

From JPMorgan…

This Thanksgiving, as families gather around the table, the festivities provide a welcome reprieve from the political tensions of recent months. With Americans expected to spend nearly a trillion dollars spreading holiday cheer, this spending showcases their resilience in a shifting economic landscape.

While holiday spending is projected by the National Retail Federation to hit a record high, sales growth, as shown by the chart of the week, is expected to fall slightly below the pre-pandemic average of 3.6%. However, this moderation reflects easing inflation rather than weakening demand. In fact, when adjusted for inflation, real sales are set to exceed last year, buoyed by record shopper turnout and an anticipated rise in per-person spending to around $900. Driving this is real wage growth, which has remained positive for a year and a half. Furthermore, stock market gains and recent Fed rate cuts have lifted consumer confidence. That said, elevated prices, along with the depletion of pandemic era savings cushions, may cap spending growth for some households.

Retailers, for whom the holiday season drives a disproportionate share of annual sales, face a mixed outlook. Deal hunting consumers are turning to discount retailers, boosting revenue and profit forecasts. Conversely, those reliant on discretionary categories like apparel and specialty goods are seeing softer demand as shoppers focus on essentials.

Despite challenges, this season reflects a broader economic trend: slowing but not stalling. As winter sets in, consumer spending is cooling but remains far from frosty—underscoring the resilience of the U.S. economy as we head into 2025.

Have questions? Ask us. We can help.

  • Created on .

Moving Forward

Last week was a big one for markets. The Fed announced another interest rate decrease, we had some good economic and corporate profit reports, and that other midweek announcement… what was that about again?

All kidding aside, you’re likely aware that the stock market surged on last week’s election news. Republicans were predicted to sweep the White House, the Senate, and the House (the latter now confirmed as I type this Tuesday morning). Very generally speaking, the stock market favors less regulation, lower taxes, and business-friendly legislation, all of which are expected when Republicans control the government. Will the market get what it wants? Perhaps, but last week and for the time being it’s all about shifting expectations.

That said, one of my professional tenets is not to lapse into politics. I don’t have anything to add other than personal opinions and I’m sure you’ve had your fill of those from elsewhere in recent days and weeks anyway. This isn’t to suggest that politics is unimportant, far from it. Instead, I prefer to deal with the practical implications of our politics, how it impacts markets, the economy, and so forth. So let’s look at some of the market reaction last week and some context as we move forward.

The stock market had been heading south a bit prior to the election but nothing major. Then the generally unexpected results (if you went by the major polls) came in late Tuesday and Wednesday saw an increase of 2.5% for the S&P 500, over 3% on the Dow, and the NASDAQ also surged higher. The S&P 500’s 50-day moving average price swung from “neutral” to “extremely overbought” in one day. For the week the S&P gained about 4.5%.

The relief rally, as described by the WSJ, impacted some parts of the market more than others. Small cap stocks had a one-day gain of nearly 6%. For the week, Tech and Financials were up over 5%, and Consumer Discretionary stocks were up 9% as investors “waved bye-bye to Bidenomics”. Bringing down the average were Real Estate, Healthcare, and Consumer Staples sectors, which each grew by maybe 2% or less. Utilities actually declined a couple percent last week. And in the realm of purely speculative assets, Bitcoin shot up and is over $86,000 as I type, based largely on assumptions the new administration will reduce regulation on cryptocurrencies.

Bonds initially fell as stocks rose but held up through week’s end. Yields on Treasury benchmarks were volatile but the 10yr Treasury yield settled around 4.3%, for example. Performance-wise, short-term bonds were flat to up a little, while medium-term bond index funds like the iShares U.S. Aggregate and Vanguard Total Bond Market were up around 0.8% for the week. Long-term bonds performed better but that’s after getting beat up during the few weeks prior. Elsewhere in fixed income, preferred stocks rose over 2% as their hybrid nature fed on optimism about stocks.

Helping fuel market performance last week was another rate reduction from the Fed. This marks 0.75% off the top of short-term rates since September. The pace of rate reductions is now expected to slow with about a 65% chance of another quarter point reduction when the Fed meets again in December. The bias is till toward reducing rates into the new year, especially since Fed Chair Jerome Powell mentioned during his press conference last week that rates are still high enough to restrict growth. But I think he, like many Americans and market participants in general, were surprised by the election results and are in recalibration-mode in terms of what policies to expect and how that changes the economic outlook. For example, the CME’s FedWatch tool currently shows investors expecting around another half percent rate reduction by Spring, versus over twice that prior to Election Day.

Along these economic lines, here’s a chart that I received yesterday from JPMorgan that speaks for itself.

As I type, markets have begun the new week with continued optimism. Will it last? Only time will tell. The jury is still out on the question of which party is better for markets. Frankly, there are too many variables and too much of a time lag to legislative changes to come up with an unbiased answer anyway. However, like I already mentioned, investors (collectively) favor the idea of Republican control, at least at the outset, and we can easily see how the market’s pulse quickened since last Wednesday.

So let’s be pragmatic and take what the political environment and markets throw at us in stride. Expect volatility while expecting long-term growth. Beyond that, if I’m managing your portfolio please know that I intend to stick with the plan. As values continue to rise in some parts of your portfolio, we’ll rebalance. Should any part of your portfolio need updating or replacing, I’ll handle it. If something has fundamentally changed in your financial life, such as your work situation or major unexpected expenses popping up, please let me know.

Have questions? Ask us. We can help.

  • Created on .

Getting Back into Bonds

Last week we looked at options for stashing cash. This week lets add a layer by looking at bonds. The topic is timely because rates and prices have been on the move in the bond market. You might be looking to rebalance your portfolio by moving some money from stocks into bonds, or maybe moving longer-term money out of cash, but what should you look at buying?

Bonds have had a rough go over the past few years and I won’t detail that here. However, it’s important to remember that the relationship between interest rates and bond prices is fundamental. If rates are going up (anticipated or actual) bond prices should go down while declining rates should lead to higher bond prices. That’s a simplified way to think about it but that’s essentially how it works.

You may wonder why we’re even considering bonds when cash has been paying 5% or more for a while. The problem is that rates on cash have already declined to roughly 4.7% and bond investors are pricing in at least a few more rate cuts from the Fed heading into Spring. If cash rates come down in tandem with the Fed your bank account or money market mutual fund could be paying a lot less by this time next year. As we’ve discussed before, what you earn on your cash is secondary to easy access without market risk, but it’s not meant to be a set it and forget it sort of thing.

This is where bonds come in. They don’t have the volatility of stocks but they do come with market risk that should equate to better returns over time. Returns come from bond interest and, hopefully, price appreciation. How much time should you give them? I think at least three years but more is better.

Here are some investment options for bonds based on general timeframes. All are low cost, diversified in their space, and readily available from any worthwhile custodian.

Short-term:

We’re not talking about money you’ll need to spend in a year or two. That’s best left in cash equivalents like a money market account or mutual fund, a bank CD, or maybe an individual Treasury bond with a specific maturity date.

Good short-term bond investments are just beyond that timeframe, such as index funds tracking a 1–3 year or 1–5 year bond index. Two funds I like are the SPDR Short Term Treasury Fund, ticker SPTS, or Vanguard Short Term Bond Index, ticker BSV. SPTS is comprised of Treasuries while BSV is about 70% Treasuries and the remainder in high quality corporate bonds. Both funds have the overwhelming majority of their portfolio invested in 2–3-year bonds. Each has an SEC-Yield of about 4% and the average yield to maturity across their bond holdings is a smidgeon higher.

Alternatives might include buying individual Treasuries or bank CDs out to three or even four years. If so, as of this writing you’d earn about the same rate as the two fund options above but wouldn’t have much chance of appreciation. Technically you could sell your Treasury or CD early if the value rises, but you’d have to watch it closely and get lucky with the timing. So you’d essentially be locking in a flat rate for multiple years – not the end of the world but also not great if prices rise around you.

Medium-term:

Medium-term in this context means bonds with maturities from three years to maybe seven. This is going out on the risk spectrum a bit further since bonds get more sensitive to changes in the rate environment as maturities get longer.

I also like index funds in this space. Specifically, Vanguard Total Bond Market, ticker BND. The fund currently holds about 70% of its money in Treasuries and bonds from other government agencies. The rest is in high quality corporate bonds. The fund currently has an SEC-yield of 4.2% but has only grown about 2% in 2024 since this space saw value declines during the first half of this year.

The big custodians like Fidelity and Schwab, and product brands like iShares, have their own version of this “total bond market” fund and to a large extent they are interchangeable. Also, there are a wide variety of index funds that hold medium-term Treasuries. iShares, for example, has 29 different options. No, my industry isn’t complicated at all…

Beyond that, there are some actively managed mutual funds that could work versus the index fund approach. These include “intermediate” or “core” bond funds from Baird, Dodge & Cox, and maybe Metropolitan West. You’re really investing in the managers and their investment styles when you buy these funds, so research that and don’t just buy the label.

Long-Term:

While you can go out 20+ years with Treasuries, “long term” in my industry really means ten years or longer. The price of the 10yr Treasury is a key economic, banking and lending benchmark and has recently risen a bit to 4.3%.

Frankly and maybe simplistically, I think ten or more years in the bond market is better as a benchmark than as an investment. I mean, if you’re willing to part with your money for that long you’d likely do better by investing in a broad stock market index fund. The popular iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, ticker symbol TLT, is nearly as volatile as the S&P 500 anyway. Last time I checked there hasn’t been a single rolling ten-year period where you would have lost money in the S&P 500. That said, maybe in a different rate environment or for other reasons, but I think most of the time you can skip buying long-term bonds. Buy stocks or other assets instead.

You’re probably getting the sense that there’s a lot of complexity to bonds and that you should have a variety of types and timeframes working in your portfolio. You can certainly punt by holding cash for a while longer, just don’t forget about it for too long because doing so will come with opportunity cost in the months, even years, ahead.

Have questions? Ask us. We can help.

  • Created on .

Stronger than Expected

In last week’s note I mentioned how many, if not most, investors are in wait-and-see mode when it comes to the new administration’s impact on the economy and markets. I also mentioned how investors generally favor traditional Republican ideals of lower taxes and less regulation. That said, nobody likes uncertainty.

Along these lines, the following is a great summary from JPMorgan on the ongoing reassessment happening in the markets. We’ve discussed this in recent weeks, but it’s helpful to get some confirmation. Investors had been expecting interest rates to drop rapidly but are now revising those assumptions. This impacts bond prices directly and feeds into stock prices, while also percolating throughout the economy. Rates remaining higher for longer would be a net-negative for the economy and would hit homebuyers and people with consumer debt hardest. The WSJ reports that the average 30yr fixed rate mortgage is about 7.4%, higher than referenced below. And the Prime rate, impacting credit card balances for example, is still at 7.75%, not terrible but substantially higher than a few years ago.

From JPMorgan…

In September, the Fed kicked off its cutting cycle because “the balance of risks” had shifted. But subsequent economic data and the election results could be shifting it back. This week’s chart shows both growth and the labor market are tracking stronger than the Fed expected, posing upside risk to inflation.

Core PCE [personal consumption expenditures] has come down since 2022, but progress has stalled over the past few months. Both CPI and PPI rose solidly this month, increasing estimates for October PCE. Moreover, the housing inflation driving CPI is unlikely to alleviate anytime soon. The ~75bp sell-off in the U.S. 10-year since the first cut has pushed mortgage rates from 6.1% to 6.8%, and housing purchase activity remains near its lowest level since 1995.

While [Fed Chair] Powell stated at the November meeting “in the near term, the election will have no effects on our policy decisions,” investors are likely more concerned about the long term. Several of Trump’s top priorities are somewhat inflationary. Immigration restrictions could re-heat the labor market, stoking wage growth, and tariffs could increase prices. This, combined with a potential trade-war supply chain disruption, could reverse recent disinflation progress in goods.

Altogether, risk seems more skewed toward inflation than in September. December revisions to the dot plot [where Fed policymakers chart their economic assumptions] should reflect this, but the Fed will likely stay the cutting course. However, markets are currently only pricing ~70bps of easing by the end of 2025, compared to ~95bps before the election and ~160bps after the September meeting. Investors should be aware future easing could progress slower and end quicker than previously expected.

Elsewhere in the realm of uncertainty, investors are waiting to learn who President-Elect Trump will nominate to be Treasury Secretary. As you can imagine, this cabinet position can have significant impacts on markets, for better or worse, and is probably the most relevant pick for investors to watch. The position is up in the air as I type this morning. The primary concern among market watchers is how willing a new Sec Tres will be to leverage tariffs. As alluded to above, trade wars, spats, and so forth slow trade in an interconnected global economy, so add that to the list of things for investors to worry about.

Ultimately, these unanswered questions stoke short-term volatility as we swing from unbridled optimism to something more guarded. This may be with us for a while as the new administration gets sorted. Remember, though, that markets can seem shaky even as prices are rising. Some have historically referred to this as climbing the wall of worry, while the WSJ over the weekend referred to investors betting on a market melt-up. However you frame it, investors are cautiously optimistic at a minimum and that’s a good thing.  

Have questions? Ask us. We can help.

  • Created on .

Happy Election Day!

Well, here we go again. This election marks the 60th time we’ve voted for a president since our nation’s founding. Polls via www.realclearpolling.com/latest-polls and the betting odds sight www.electionbettingodds.com have been all over the place but generally indicate a tight race. We won’t know until we know but if what’s past is prologue, this could be a long day.

In the markets, as I type the S&P 500 is set to open up a bit after a couple weeks of generally being down. The index is sitting right in the middle of its overbought/oversold range so, like the rest of us, the markets are in wait-and-see mode.

Even though it’s less convenient, I like going to the polling place and voting in person on Election Day. We used to bring our kids and today we’ll take our son, now 18, to vote in his first General Election. There’s something about feeling that thrum of history even though it may seem a little antiquated these days.

Apparently a growing number of us prefer to vote early or via mail since nearly half of all the votes cast in the 2020 general election, for example, are in the books already this cycle. Regardless of how you voted, every vote matters and I still believe it’s a powerful thing.

I’ll be back next week with some information about how the markets did or didn’t respond to the election results. Otherwise, enjoy the day as we take another step in our Nation’s history.

Have questions? Ask us. We can help.

  • Created on .

Stashing Cash

Over the past several weeks we covered a handful of year-end considerations with the last being partly related to generating cash. In that post I mentioned how money market funds and bank CDs were great places to store cash. Let’s dig into that a bit this week. This is especially important because the short-term interest rate environment that drives this space is changing.

I tend to lapse into jargon when discussing these topics and some of that is unavoidable. My industry is complicated and there are multiple ways to say the same thing. One example is the use of the word “cash”.

Most of us think of cash as what we carry around but, in the financial services industry, cash also refers to investments deemed to be equivalent to cash. This means any federally-insured bank deposit product or other no-risk investment with a maturity of one year or less. So when we say cash we’re referring to money in your…

Checking, savings and money market accounts at your bank or credit union – that’s obvious.

Money market mutual funds and bank CDs bought within an investment account.

Individual US Treasury securities and maybe general obligation bonds issued by a state.

In other words, cash equivalents are the safe stuff, liquid and without market risk.

So in our example of last week you sold some investments to generate $20,000 to spend in the next year or so. You wanted to essentially eliminate risk on this money since you’ll have to spend it soon. That’s very prudent of you, but what should you do with the money in the meantime?

An easy answer is to deposit the cash into your checking or savings account but those accounts usually pay the least amount of interest. A quick review of a regional credit union’s website suggests they’ll pay a tenth of a percent on checking and savings balances. That’s not a good place for excess cash to linger.

The next best place to store cash would be a money market account at the same institution. These accounts typically have some access restrictions so you should get paid higher interest. The same credit union offers yields from 0.75% to maybe 3.5% or 4% at higher balances of $100,000 or more.

Remember that these percentages are annualized yields based on current rates and aren’t guaranteed. Money market rates fluctuate along with the short-term interest rate market and how aggressive the bank wants to be when gathering new deposits.

These rates were higher a month or so ago before the Federal Reserve lowered its short-term rate benchmark by half a percent. As I type the market is expecting about another 1.5% in rate reductions over the coming months so yields on cash should continue heading south.

But is that a terrible thing? After all, the money you keep at your bank or credit union is federally insured up to at least $250,000 and there’s no market risk. While not terrible, you can and should try to do better.

You could look at certificates of deposit at your current institution. The credit union I referenced above offers 4.75% annual percentage yield for CDs going out 6-8 months, perfect for short-term money. Go shorter and the rate drops. Perhaps ironically, the rate also drops if you go longer. A 12-month CD pays 4.25%, for example. Still, it’s safe money with a guaranteed rate for that length of time and is gettable before maturity if you’re willing to pay a penalty, usually a few months’ worth of interest.

Can you do better than that? In a word, yes, but it would mean opening a new account somewhere else. A quick review of “high-yield savings accounts” at www.bankrate.com shows FDIC-insured banks offering from 4% to over 5% on cash. Again, that’s not guaranteed for any length of time but the online banks referenced here are usually more aggressive than their traditional brick-and-mortar counterparts. You could also look at CD rates on this site and maybe go that route to address the time factor.

Instead, what I favor is leaving the cash in your investment account where you sold the investments (yes, my opinion is biased). There you can buy a money market mutual fund, CDs from a variety of FDIC-insured banks, or even individual Treasury securities. Link this account to your checking account and move money within a day or two. I think this setup offers more flexibility.

For example, here are some current rates you could find within an investment account, whether it’s a taxable brokerage, IRA, or even 401(k) with some custodians.

Schwab Value Advantage, ticker symbol SWVXX – This is a money market mutual fund designed to have a fixed $1 per share and pay monthly dividends that accrue daily. I use this frequently since Schwab is the custodian for most of my clients. The portfolio contains short-term government bonds, bank CDs, and other cash equivalents that, taken together, have an average weighted maturity of about 26 days. The fund had been paying around 5.2% but now pays about 4.7% because of the Fed change already mentioned.

Vanguard Federal Money Market, ticker symbol VMFXX – This is a popular money market fund at Vanguard that currently pays about 4.8% after recently paying more, same as with the Schwab fund. VMFXX has a weighted average maturity of about 30 days.

Fidelity and other brokerage firms often have their own version of these money market funds and most pay about the same as Schwab and Vanguard. Just watch out for fees and transaction charges at some firms (that shall remain nameless…)

Brokerage CDs – These are issued by FDIC-insured banks but bought through your investment account. I prefer CDs that go out to maybe 12 months, can’t be called away early, and that have a decent yield. I’m currently seeing about 4% or a little better for this timeframe. If you need to get out early you’d sell the CD on the open market within your account, sometimes at a slight gain but other times at a slight loss.

Individual Treasuries – US Treasury securities are among the most liquid investments available. Easily purchased in your investment account, you can also buy at www.treasurydirect.gov. As with brokerage CDs, you can choose a maturity period and rate combination that works best for your situation. Rates are a little higher as I type, maybe 4.3% for a 1yr bond. Again, watch out for transaction fees at some firms.

So there’s a summary of a few relatively simple options for holding cash. More exotic options come with various risks, costs, and strings attached so I avoid those like the plague. In short, keep your cash simple while trying to earn the highest rate reasonably possible. This is easily doable with a little legwork.

Have questions? Ask us. We can help.

  • Created on .

Contact

  • Phone:
    (707) 800-6050
  • E-Mail:
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
  • Let's Begin:

Ridgeview Financial Planning is a California registered investment advisor. Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | ADV
Copyright © Ridgeview Financial Planning | Powered by AdvisorFlex